Al Jazeera
What is Lebanon's 'gap law' that attempts to end the financial crisis?
Confidence:
•●●●○○
Disagreement:
•institutional
Values Alignment:
●●●●○7/10ℹ️
⚡Key Takeaways
- 1The gap law restructures $100+ billion in frozen deposits, converting at below-market rates to address currency collapse and unlock IMF aid.
- 2Structural analysis reveals two interdependent requirements: economic restructuring (IMF condition) and institutional reform (corruption prevention).
- 3Optimal solution framework: simultaneous asset recovery, depositor compensation, transparent oversight, and governance reforms tied to aid disbursement.
- 4Three plausible outcomes: implementation with compensation (stability), delay (state failure), or revision through democratic pressure (uncertain but potentially transformative).
- 5The core issue is systemic: Lebanon's political economy enables elite extraction. Solutions must address both economic symptoms and institutional causes.
What Happened
- •Lebanon's parliament passed a 'gap law' in December 2024 to restructure the banking sector and address the currency crisis.
- •The law converts frozen dollar deposits to Lebanese pounds at a rate far below market value, effectively writing off most depositor savings.
- •Mass protests erupted in Beirut as citizens rejected what they see as making ordinary people pay for elite corruption.
- •The IMF requires this restructuring before releasing aid, creating a catch-22: no restructuring means no aid, but the restructuring punishes those who didn't cause the crisis.
- •Implementation details remain unclear, with the central bank and political class avoiding specifics about compensation or timelines.
Opposite Sides
←Left Wing Perspective
This is elite theft disguised as reform. The gap law forces working-class depositors to pay for a crisis created by corrupt politicians and banks. We need accountability first—prosecute the corrupt, recover stolen assets, then restructure. The IMF's demands are neoliberal austerity that protects the powerful while punishing ordinary people. This is class warfare, not economic policy.
Right Wing Perspective→
Hard choices are necessary for survival. Lebanon needs IMF aid to prevent complete state collapse. The gap law is painful but essential restructuring. Depositors' losses are unfortunate, but the alternative—no aid, continued collapse—hurts everyone more. We need stability first, accountability can come later. This is pragmatism, not corruption.
The Unspoken Tension
Both sides are partially right, but both miss the core issue: Lebanon's political system is fundamentally broken. The left correctly identifies elite corruption, but ignores the urgent need for aid. The right correctly identifies the need for stability, but ignores the moral bankruptcy of making victims pay. The real question: Can Lebanon have both accountability AND restructuring?
⚖️Plausible Solutions (Radical Centrist Approach)
A radical centrist approach demands both:
1Implement the gap law with a fairer conversion rate and meaningful depositor compensation funded by asset recovery from corrupt elites,
2Simultaneously launch aggressive anti-corruption prosecutions targeting the political class and banks,
3Create a transparent, independent oversight body to manage restructuring and ensure accountability,
4Structure IMF aid to include governance reforms that prevent future elite extraction. This isn't either/or—it's both/and. Lebanon needs economic restructuring AND political accountability, not one at the expense of the other.
This isn't either/or—it's both/and. Lebanon needs economic restructuring AND political accountability, not one at the expense of the other.
Where the Disagreement Really Lives
Institutional Disagreement
The disagreement is about how systems, institutions, or structures should function—conflicts over governance, processes, or institutional design.
What We Know / What We Don't
Confidence:
●●●○○
✓
What We Know
The Lebanese pound has lost 95% of its value since 2019. Banks froze $100+ billion in deposits. The currency gap—official rate 1,500 vs. market rate 90,000—makes restructuring mathematically brutal.
The IMF won't release aid without restructuring. Lebanon's debt-to-GDP is among the world's highest. Basic services (electricity, water) are collapsing. Previous reforms failed. Public trust is nonexistent.
?
What We Don't Know
Will depositors accept massive losses? Will protests escalate? Will the political class actually implement this, or water it down like past attempts? Will international creditors accept this framework?
Plausible Paths Forward
1
If Law implemented as written:
Depositors lose 80-90% of savings. IMF aid unlocks. Protests continue but don't stop implementation. Banking sector shrinks dramatically. Slow, painful recovery begins, but social trust remains broken.
2
If Law modified or delayed:
No IMF aid. Currency collapse continues. State services fail completely. Mass emigration accelerates. Lebanon becomes a failed state with regional powers filling the vacuum.
3
If Protests force revision:
Government legitimacy collapses. Either genuine reform emerges from crisis, or complete institutional breakdown. Recovery timeline extends by years, but potential for real change increases.
The Quiet Take
💭
The core structural problem: Lebanon's political economy is built on elite extraction. The gap law addresses symptoms (currency collapse, frozen deposits) but not the underlying cause (corrupt governance). Analysis suggests two necessary conditions for sustainable resolution: (1) Economic restructuring to unlock IMF aid and stabilize the currency, and (2) Institutional reform to prevent future elite extraction. These are interdependent—restructuring without accountability enables continued corruption, while accountability without restructuring leads to state collapse. The optimal solution framework requires simultaneous implementation: asset recovery from corrupt elites to fund depositor compensation, transparent restructuring oversight, and governance reforms tied to IMF aid disbursement. This creates incentives for both economic stability and political accountability.
What Would Change Our View
↻
Conditions That Would Shift Our Assessment
1If depositors receive meaningful compensation or fairer rates, this becomes legitimate reform, not elite protectionism.
2If the IMF rejects it, the law is likely insufficient.
3If protests force revision, it shows democratic accountability still works—a positive sign even if it delays aid.
4If the political class is actually replaced, Lebanon's prospects fundamentally improve regardless of this law's outcome.
Explore coverage from 42 different publications
Comments
Loading comments...